On 30-Jun-2011, at 9:09, Andreas Jonsson wrote:
> (..)
> ^'{|'
> table garbage
> ^'|' block element contents
> ^'|-'
> table garbage
> ^'|}'
> (..)
> '<table>'
> table garbage
> '<tr>'
> table garbage
> '<td>' block element contents '</td>'
> table garbage
> '</tr>'
> table garbage
> '</table>'
>
> 1. How should the treatment of table garbage be specified? My
> recommendation is to change the semantics compared to the original
> and just specify that table garbage should be ignored.
This kind of garbage handling would be acceptable, right? This probably falls
in the category "shouldn't do that anyway", IMO.
> 1. Once both types of tables have been opened, use internal tokens
> interchangeably.
>
> 2. Let inner tables take precedence and disable tokens of outer table type.
>
> 3. Let outer tables take precedence and implicitly terminate inner table
> if table tokens of outer table type is encountered.
I wrote a whole piece down about how enabling and disabling tokens shouldn't be
needed here, but I see the problem now. I think option 2 is the most intuitive.
But can't we include TD and TR tokens in the wikitext table specification? That
would extend the grammar a bit, but that is no problem.
Cheers, Jan Paul
_______________________________________________
Wikitext-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
