On 12-02-02 12:16 PM, Gabriel Wicke wrote: > On 02/02/2012 08:36 PM, Daniel Friesen wrote: >> I'm tempted to say that rather than the template being the itemtype we >> should have a proper itemtype. >> <div itemscope itemtype=' >> http://www.mediawiki.org/microdata/wikitext/Transclusion";> >> <meta itemprop="PageTitle" content="Template:Sometemplate"> >> [...] >> </div> > Hmm- from the data modeling aspect, the template really determines the > vocabulary used in the content. It would be hard to specify a common > schema for http://www.mediawiki.org/microdata/wikitext/Transclusion, > unless the vocabulary is reduced to a purely syntactical level. > > Gabriel Got a more verbose example of what could go wrong with an example so I can follow up with an example of how it could be done? Or more to the point. Got something I could look over on how you intended to model this in a way that wasn't based on syntax, so I can make a better example in context?
itemtype is really a meant for a real type, I'd really hate to see Microdata abused to the point where we abuse itemtype as a reference url and pretend that half of everything using itemtype comes from wiki syntax rather than a user entering microdata into WikiText. ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] _______________________________________________ Wikitext-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
