On 25.04.2012 19:10, Brion Vibber wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Gabriel Wicke <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 04/25/2012 06:42 PM, Brion Vibber wrote: > > It's a human-readable text format, so I'd advocate for text/x-wiki. I > > don't know where or how the application/x-wiki came about. > > This was pretty much the reason why I picked it for action=raw back then. > > I like Daniel's idea to use something more specific to MediaWiki though. > Maybe text/x-mediawiki? > > > I'm down with that. :)
Well... changing the mime type now might break a bunch of clients that rely on it, no? At least in cases where it's actually used in a ContentType header. For practical reasons, I suggest to stay with application/x-wiki, and make action=raw use that too, unless ctype=text/x-wiki. then it should use text/x-wiki in the ContentType header too. -- daniel _______________________________________________ Wikitext-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
