Hi Subbu, I have another two question: 1. According to the roadmap, you will research the “HTML-only wiki support” and “DOM-based templating”. Does it mean that if you launch these functions, wikitext will no longer be supported, even the round-trip doesn’t work? 2. In “MediaWiki_DOM_spec” there are a lot of discussing and implemented status. Will the parsoid output change a lot in the future? What is the approximate percentage?
Thanks Feng Yi On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:00 PM, <[email protected]>wrote: > Send Wikitext-l mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Wikitext-l digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Diff between real Parsoid result and Introduction page > (Subramanya Sastry) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:13:59 -0700 > From: Subramanya Sastry <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wikitext-l] Diff between real Parsoid result and > Introduction page > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > On 09/10/2013 02:18 AM, Feng Yi wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm in google wiki knowledge team and currently work on Parsoid. > > I found there are some diffs between > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Parsoid/MediaWiki_DOM_spec and real > > Parsoid output. > > For example: /RFC 1945 / > > in page: > > <arel="mw:ExtLink/PMID" > > resource="http://purl.org/commons/html/pmid/20610307"; > > href="//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20610307?dopt=Abstract < > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20610307?dopt=Abstract>" > > about="#_:PMID-20610307-1234" > > class="external mw-magiclink-pmid"> > > PMID 20610307 > > </a> > > in Parsoid: > > *<a typeof="mw:ExtLink/RFC" href="//tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945 > > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945>" rel="mw:ExtLink/RFC">RFC > > 1945</a></p>* > > / > > / > > I have removed the "parsoid-data" and other global tags, but still > > a lot of diff. > > The page is updated several days ago, so is the released Parsoid > > not newest? > > > Hi Feng, > > The spec for RFC is this: > > <a rel="mw:ExtLink/RFC" > href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945"; > resource="urn:ietf:rfc:1945" > about="#_RFC-1945-1234" > class="external mw-magiclink-rfc"> > RFC 1945 > </a> > > and output after discarding data-parsoid is: > > <a rel="mw:ExtLink/RFC" > href="//tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945" > typeof="mw:ExtLink/RFC"> > RFC 1945 > </a> > > So, there are diffs, yes. We are in the process of cleaning up our spec > (and actively making a few changes) -- in some cases, the spec is > outdated, and in other cases, the spec has information about proposed > changes (but not yet implemented). In the next week or so, we'll try to > clean up our spec (removing/updating outdated information, or adding > annotations where the spec is proposing changes). > > Thanks for alerting us about the mismatch. > > Subbu. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitext-l/attachments/20130910/753fb14e/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitext-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l > > > End of Wikitext-l Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6 > ***************************************** >
_______________________________________________ Wikitext-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
