2010/5/14 Gerald A <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Leigh Blackall schrieb:
>> > Would be a problem to install the "Widgets" media wiki extension?
>>
>> That's for for your local admin to decide. WMDE will not *run* that
>> server, we
>> just help with financing it. What gets on the server, how you keep it
>> secure,
>> which projects are approved and who gets access is entirely up to you.
>>
>> All we require is a number of projects and people committed to taking care
>> of
>> them, so we know what the box will be used for. And a regular report, so
>> we know
>> it's still being used to its original purpose - that is, projects that
>> somehow
>> benefit wikiversity.
>>
>
> I think Leigh is asking if we can install arbitrary extensions for
> Mediawiki on the sandbox server.
>
> I think that would be a wonderful project. Originally, I saw the Sandbox
> server as somewhere CS students could play to get Programming skills, and
> even to perhaps hack on Mediawiki a bit. We'll see if that might happen, but
> I think a testing ground for Mediawiki and it's extensions would be a great
> project. It just needs a project leader, and someone who is technical to
> help out. Should we put you down as a potential project lead, Leigh? :)
>


Has Jan not offered to take the lead on the Mediawiki project? (
http://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Sandbox_Server/Project/MediaWiki) A
question that comes to mind here: if, say, Leigh and Jan were both willing
to take the lead on this project, would it be possible to have two root
admins for an individual project?


>
> As a side note: glaring security problems may make the sandbox server
>> *harmful*
>> to wikimedia. That would be a reason to discontinue the funding. We trust
>> you to
>> keep it sane.
>>
>
> Let me say something here -- I don't think "glaring" security problems are
> acceptable. As a seasoned admin, I can't say an experimental server will be
> 100% problem free, but project leaders should be made aware we expect them
> to take reasonable measures to make sure their projects are secure, and any
> found or reported to be insecure can be suspended without notice. We want to
> encourage innovation, but with security somewhere in the picture.
>

Agreed.

I'd also like to say, it's great to see you again Gerald. Thanks so much for
joining in here with such enthusiasm. :-)

Cormac
_______________________________________________
Wikiversity-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l

Reply via email to