And likewise Joe, if there's something missing in the WP article, please add it. The talk page reveals an interesting debate. On 26/12/2013 5:51 AM, "Joe Corneli" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Leigh: > > It looks relevant, definitely. I didn't realize the connection with > Christopher Alexander goes so deep (it's been a while since I looked > at his book). I'll have to add something about that in the section of > the Peeragogy Handbook on patterns (which I'm revising currently). > > Thank you! > > Joe > > PS. I added a "See also" link to that article on > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_learning, which is basically the > "literature review" for Peeragogy. > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Leigh Blackall > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Joe, regarding peeragogy, you interested in checking the Wikipedia > article > > Networked learning? > > > > On 25/12/2013 5:47 AM, "Joe Corneli" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Abd ulRahman Lomax <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Back to the immediate topic, suppose there is a group of students who > >> > want > >> > to learn math. Perhaps they can find a teacher, but suppose now that > >> > there > >> > is no teacher. Suppose that everyone one of us is such a student, that > >> > there > >> > are no experts. This, in fact, is the position of real scientists. The > >> > "student/teacher" model is for children, and it doesn't necessarily > work > >> > well even there, and definitely not for deep education, where it's > >> > necessary > >> > for the student to discover and build understanding out of their own > >> > experience. Otherwise "education" becomes simply filling a data > storage > >> > unit > >> > with data, without understanding how to *create* the data (and > >> > understanding > >> > its limitations). Skilled teachers will lead their students through > this > >> > process, not just expect them to be baby birds, mouths open to be > filled > >> > with the wisdom of the teacher. > >> > >> This is something that we talk a lot about on Yet One Other Website > >> (peeragogy.org). > >> > >> I am sincerely interested to think about how wikiversity does or does > >> not fit together with other efforts. It certainly can't be insular... > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikiversity-l mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikiversity-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikiversity-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikiversity-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
