Great idea! I'm pro. The bigger the knowledge-network, the more opportunities.
Grtngs, Cedric Op 20-jan.-2012 17:00 schreef "Sebastian Hellmann" < [email protected]> het volgende: > (I'm cross posting to > dbpedia-wiktionary@lists.**sourceforge.net<[email protected]> > ) > > Hi Thomas, > interesting, that you posted on this list. It is the discussion list list > for Wiktionary in general. > I did a mail count for this list for 2011 and this is the result: > 29 mails total > 11 were general announcements such as the Wikimania > 10 were about Wiktionary issues > 8 were about information extraction of Wiktionary (Mostly caused by us and > the Wiktionary RDF Extraction announcement). > > 2010 looks similar. > > I was wondering, if the extraction of data from Wiktionary could become a > main topic on this list. > > Shall we merge communities into this list? > > 1. There is a DBpedia Wiktionary to RDF list with 18 members here: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/**lists/listinfo/dbpedia-**wiktionary<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-wiktionary> > > 2. Then some people might join from http://linguistics.okfn.org/ > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-linguistics<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics> > This is a Working Group for Open Data in Linguistics and there are maybe > 5-10 people there that are interested in extraction of structured data from > Wiktionary. > > 3. People from many approaches such as http://code.google.com/p/** > wikokit/ <http://code.google.com/p/wikokit/> (does not seem to have a > mailing list) could be redirected here. > > In the end all want to get structured data out of Wiktionary. If this > would be possible, the number of Wiki editors would also increase. > > What do you think? I am not sure about all ramification, but focusing all > efforts on Wiktionary-l would be nice and would benefit Wiktionary. > Sebastian > > > > > > On 01/11/2012 03:50 PM, Thomas Schandl wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I recently found your very interesting projects as I was looking for >> semantically rich dumps of Wiktionary, and I wanted to tell you about my >> use cases. >> >> I work for the Semantic Web Company (we are also partners in the LOD2 >> project) and we have a term and phrase extractor, which we want to >> improve by enriching the extraction model with their various grammatical >> forms of the model's terms. >> >> So additions we are most interested in are declinations, tenses and >> synonyms for German and English. >> Another use case would be to use Wiktionary data to suggest translations >> of controlled terms in a thesaurus. So the available translations would >> be great to have in RDF, too. >> >> Best regards, >> Thomas >> > > > -- > Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann > Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig > Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://dbpedia.org > Homepage: > http://bis.informatik.uni-**leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann<http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann> > Research Group: http://aksw.org > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wiktionary-l mailing list > [email protected].**org <[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l> > _______________________________________________ Wiktionary-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
