On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 13:37 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > On Friday 06 March 2009, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 12:52 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > > > On Friday 06 March 2009, The Hereweb wrote: > > > > My card was activited on XOHM under Windows first. > > > > > > > > In both XOHM and Clearwire, each uses a hotline website for the user to > > > > set up their billing account/cc#/etc. XOHM is different however in > > > > that it uses OMA-DM as part of the device activation process whereas > > > > Clear does not currently. > > > > > > Yeah, I was able to activate in XOHM some time ago without OMA-DM, but I > > > am concerned that they might have changed the process--that's why I keep > > > looking for guinea pigs :) > > > > I tried the other day, but got some segfaults in wimaxd releated to > > pthreads. This was rawhide though, and I didn't have enough time to > > install the glibc-debuginfo, but will do that soon. > > Huh, that should not be happening (tm).
Yeah, I'll track that down, at least get a backtrace with symbols. > > A question though; how do iwlagn and i2400m interact WRT radio > > contention? On windows you have to disable wifi before you can use > > wimax; does wimaxd handle that and refuse scans while wifi is active? > > If you have the 5350, there is one radio for each, so they are able to > work at the same time. Oh really? Ok; that's not allowed in Windows AFAICT. The Intel connection manager makes me turn off wifi before doing wimax. dan _______________________________________________ wimax mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxwimax.org/mailman/listinfo/wimax
