On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Darius Augulis wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> > Hi Darius,
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 06:46 -0700, Darius Augulis wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> What is the state of this project? What are the main ideas of it?
> >> I read old posts from Dirk Brandewie and now I'm looking for more info.
> >
> > The main idea of the project is to provide a standard interface to WiMax
> > devices to the Connection/Network managers in the system.  The current
> > definition of the interface is available via git at:
> > git://linuxwimax.org/dbus_wimaxapi.git
>
> ok, that's exactly what I imagined.
>
> > The state of the project is I am trying to free up the resources/time to
> > get the implementation done, my team has been consumed getting a release
> > of another product over the last couple of months.
> >
> > The current state of the interface definition is the result of a lot of
> > work and input from others on the list,  I just happen to be holding the
> > the pen ATM.  I would be interested in your comments on the interface
> > and how it maps to your adapter.
>
> I will review your work and try to test in my project.

In addition to this, we are working on a kernel level API that would work at 
WiMAX NAP level -- the proposal is here:

http://linuxwimax.org/pipermail/wimax/2008-December/000300.html

The idea is that that API is provided by the kernel (accessible as commands / 
signals marshalled over generic netlink) and the driver implements the 
backend of them, the WiMAX stack doing as much of the common heavy lifting as 
possible. 

Devices that expose a basestation-level or Network Access Provider level 
interface can use that. I haven't heard yet of any devices that work at the 
NSP level without host aid.

Would this interface work for your device?

-- 
Inaky

_______________________________________________
wimax mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxwimax.org/mailman/listinfo/wimax

Reply via email to