However, for those us like myself that live in "no man's land" in Colorado, in a town of 53 people, if they beam it to the big antenna in the village from where ever, all 53 people live within 600 feet give or take for the repeater. At max, only 3 repeaters would be required. Just don't remember what the distance is for the "big" antennas. .
Daniel Wysocki Twin*.*Computers Fast Reliable Wallet-Friendly ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected] > On 4 May 2005 at 7:09, Rick Glazier wrote with great clarity on Re: Wireless broadband for $20: > > > That comes down to what the repeaters cost. > > If they can beam the signal to the repeater and > > afford the cost on a one each per customer, > > (like where customers are far apart), then you > > might just see it rural... > > > > The article say the distance is 600 feet and houses in the rural area > are much further apart. -- ---------------------------------------- The WIN-HOME list is hosted on a Windows 2000(TM) machine running L-Soft international's LISTSERV(R) software. To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have questions about the list, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
