I used tinyurl until a couple years ago when it was down for more than a day. At that time I started using snipurl and haven't had any reason to change back.
It has absolutely *nothing* to do with features. Although I must say, snipurl's clean home page, devoid of advertising, is certainly more appealing. Carl -----Original Message----- From: Windows Home/SOHO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Johnson Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Win2K reboots before it finishes loading At 02:55 AM 10/11/2006, Carl Houseman typed: >Minimum RAM requirement for Win2K is 32MB: http://snipurl.com/yptt Just wondering if there was any reason why you prefer snipurl to tinyurl ? I know that tinyurl now has a preview feature <http://tinyurl.com/preview.php> that takes a user to the tinyurl website & displays the longer url for the most paranoid among us after all we can't expect MSFT to protect us from everything. I see that snipurl tries to access ones clipboard which could save time but could be also construed as troublesome but overall it seems that snipurl has many more features than tinyurl. If there is a particular feature that you like would you please share? TIA ----------+---------- Wayne D. Johnson Ashland, OH, USA 44805 <http://www.wavijo.com> -- ---------------------------------------- WIN-HOME Archives: http://PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM/archives/WIN-HOME.html Contact the List Owner about anything: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Official Win-Home List Members Profiles Page http://www.besteffort.com/winhome/Profiles.html
