> or else extend Strawberry Perl into Raspberry
> Perl that is Strawberry for IIS or something along those lines.
yummy :-)

At the bottom of  I'd like to make a slightly different proposition,
but first please help to understand something. Why don't more people
ask for a good solution to run perl websites on windowz?  The emphasis
of this sentence is on "good solution", not on "Perl" or on "Windows".
Take this as immutuable requirements.

Seriously I don't understand that point. Because from what I can seen
you only had ONE stack that really helps you doing this.

   IIS / Strawberry Perl / FCGI

-- Why IIS and not Apache?
Because if you work for a real Windows shop you know that this
question is simply non-existent ....

-- Why Strawberry and not Activestate (installs a quite usable isapi
extension for perl)
CPAN

-- Why FCGI and not CGI or mod_perl
AFAIK mod_perl doesn't exist for IIS and CGI is not an option for
running web apps.

You see, seems like there is really just one solution!

I simply cannot believe, that I'm the only one that want to run a perl
web app on windows.

Proposition for a FCGI/Perl INSTALLER (fcgiperl.msi)
=========================================
1. Checks if the FastCGI package from Microsoft is installed, if not
it automatically installed it.
2. Register "Perl" in FastCGI configuration
3. Setup the extension configuration (.pl ->
c:\strawberry\bin\perl.exe) on the vhost (website)

What do you think? Or are there other good solutions besides fcgi?

thanks.






2009/1/23 David Golden <xda...@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Ben Jakb <ben.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering why it seems like nobody cares how to setup Strawberry
>> Perl with fcgi on iis. As far as I know the necessery hooks and
>> configurations aren't done automatically when run the Strawberry Perl
>> installer. I think this is a plus when you go with Activestate Perl
>> because you have cgi and isapi configured automatically.
>
> I'm not sure I follow what you mean by "hooks and configurations" -- but I
> admit I know squat about IIS.  If you can explain the necessary changes and
> if they don't conflict with other user needs, then it should be feasibly to
> include them in the future, or else extend Strawberry Perl into Raspberry
> Perl that is Strawberry for IIS or something along those lines.
>
> -- David
>

Reply via email to