Are you sure this is the latest PDL git from sf.net? The error here looks like something that has already been fixed as of CPAN developers release 2.4.9_008 according to the PDL Release_Notes.
--Chris On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kmx <k...@atlas.cz> wrote: > Chris, > > that sounds great, however my attempt ended up with: > > C:\strawberry\perl\bin\perl.exe C:\strawberry\perl\lib\ExtUtils\xsubpp > -typemap C:\strawberry\perl\lib\ExtUtils\typemap -typemap typemap Core.xs >> Core.xsc && C:\strawberry\perl\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e mv -- > Core.xsc Core.c > Could not find a typemap for C type 'PDL_Long *' in Core.xs > > -- > kmx > > On 7.11.2011 20:40, Chris Marshall wrote: >> >> I just pushed a new PDL git with a fix for the perl >> vs POSIX threads namespace/implementation collision. >> You should be able to build with the unedited pthread.h >> now.... >> >> --Chris >> >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM, chm<devel.chm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> dmake test passed all except the known problem >>> with t/pthreadBarf.t. Also, I think we can fix >>> the breakage in pthread.h by doing the undef >>> in our pdlmagic file that is including pthread.h. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Chris >>> >>> On 11/6/2011 5:40 PM, chm wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I got it to work with the following: >>>> >>>> Add after the POSIX Threads comment block in pthread.h: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> #ifdef PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE >>>>> #undef PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE >>>>> #endif >>>>> >>>> >>>> in order to remedy the fact that perl has added a macro >>>> with the same value. If the pthread one is not already >>>> defined then the perl one is---but this breaks the w32 >>>> pthreads include file. >>>> >>>> Then set the parameters in perldl.conf to >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> WITH_POSIX_THREADS => 1, >>>>> >>>>> POSIX_THREADS_INC => undef, # '-I/usr/pthread/include' >>>>> POSIX_THREADS_LIBS => '-lpthread', # '-L/usr/pthread -lpthreadGC2' >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is building away as I type. Will let you know how >>>> dmake test comes out.... >>>> >>>> --Chris >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/6/2011 4:31 PM, chm wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi kmx- >>>>> >>>>> The detection for the pthread library is currently broken. >>>>> To build PDL with pthreads you'll need to explicitly set >>>>> the values of WITH_POSIX_THREADS, POSIX_THREADS_INC, and >>>>> POSIX_THREADS_LIBS where the comment indicate what worked >>>>> for my strawberry perl install was: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> WITH_POSIX_THREADS => undef, >>>>>> >>>>>> POSIX_THREADS_LIBS => '-LC:/chm/strawberry/pthreads/lib >>>>>> -lpthreadGC2', >>>>>> POSIX_THREADS_INC => '-IC:/chm/strawberry/pthreads/include', >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and the C:/chm/strawberry/pthreads contained the pthreads >>>>> install location. I'm actually working on the detection >>>>> code this evening so that if a pthread library is in the >>>>> correct location it would be detected and used. >>>>> >>>>> I'll give your library a build try this evening if I can. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/6/2011 4:14 PM, kmx wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris and/or Rob, >>>>>> >>>>>> could you please try the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1/ take >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://strawberryperl.com/package/kmx/p5.14.2.1-RC/strawberry-perl-5.14.2.1-portable-32bit-beta-1.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2/ take >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://strawberryperl.com/package/kmx/32_libs/5.14-extras/32bit_pthreads-2.9.0-bin_20111101.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> (unzip into the same dir as 1/) >>>>>> >>>>>> 3/ try to build PDL with pthreads support >>>>>> >>>>>> My quick test failed during PDL installation (but it was really a >>>>>> quick >>>>>> shot) >>>>>> >>>>>> Any feedback welcome >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> kmx >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3.11.2011 14:13, Chris Marshall wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We've tested the PDL pthread support with "POSIX Threads >>>>>>> (pthreads) for Win32" at http://sourceware.org/pthreads-win32/ . >>>>>>> It is nice because it allows PDL computations to make use >>>>>>> of multicore processors for calculations. Always nice to see >>>>>>> those factors of 2X, 4X, 6X, or more in speedup.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Chris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Sisyphus<sisyph...@optusnet.com.au> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "kmx" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As for the future gcc-4.6.2 toolchain there is also an interesting >>>>>>>>> question about including pthreads or winpthreads support as PDL is >>>>>>>>> AFAIK >>>>>>>>> somohow able to handle threads this way (not sure if this is valid >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> Win32) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, pthreads works with PDL on Win32. >>>>>>>> There's a crash in one of PDL's pthread test scripts that needs to >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> sorted >>>>>>>> out, but the basic functionality seems to be fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Rob >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> No virus found in this message. >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>> Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2092/4000 - Release Date: 11/06/11 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
