Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you think (1) is an potentially acceptable solution I can make the > Win16 thunking layer use it as a proof of concept. It will not take that > much time to do that I think, then we will see if my ideas will work I > am not 100% sure yet. Why don't you start implementing the x86 emulator instead? then once we have something that starts working we can worry about fixing the problems we encounter (and there will be many more problems than just function pointers...) -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal calling conve... Patrik Stridvall
- Re: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal calling ... Alexandre Julliard
- RE: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal calling ... Patrik Stridvall
- Re: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal call... Alexandre Julliard
- RE: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal calling ... Patrik Stridvall
- Re: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal call... Alexandre Julliard
- RE: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal calling ... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal call... Alexandre Julliard
- RE: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal calling ... Patrik Stridvall
- Re: DRFCE Wine's dependency on the pascal call... Alexandre Julliard