On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 11:55:44PM -0600, David Elliott wrote:
> Juergen Lock wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 11:51:53PM -0600, David Elliott wrote:
> > > Juergen Lock wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 09:39:05PM -0600, David Elliott wrote:
> > > > > Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >
> > >
> > > In any case, it was mentioned that you can instead use the Registry functions to
> > > read the key where wine stores it's config info.
> > >
> > Ah yes, the PROFILE_GetWineIniString now just calls the Reg*, thats true.
> >
>
> Okay, so I could cheat and use PROFILE_GetWineIniString or use the Reg functions.
> Alexandre probably wants people to start using the Reg functions though so that the
> code will compile without exporting functions like PROFILE_*.
>
Ok i wasn't aware he wanted that. (but it makes sense i guess...)
> >
> > > Yeah.. I messed up on that ifdef linux. I'll send in a patch in a little bit
> > > (soon as I am done reading the rest of the mail).
> > >
> > Thanx!
> >
>
> Hnmmm.. as soon as CVS comes back up that will work. I guess that is what I get for
> deciding to switch to CVS instead of patching against the last release.
Naah... just put this in /etc/hosts until the `main' server is up
again: (or was that in fact really the mirror, i always forget...)
# XXX wine cvs use ursula.gmcl.com aka winehq.com 4 now
24.108.0.54 cvs.winehq.com
You could also use cvs -d if you don't want to hack the resolver...
> Attached is a
> patch from me locally diffing it. I tested it by adding -Ulinux to the options in
>the
> Makefile.
>
Ok thanx, will try that in a moment.
> > No TAO is only good for data CDs, i know that... :)
> >
>
> Well, you *CAN* make an audio CD in TAO mode.. but the question is.. do you want to?
>
Thats what i meant.
> >
> > > I have sort of a hobby of cutting music for a friend of mine who owns a dance
> > > studio.
> >
> > Hmm pity you're so far away, i'd like to listen to what you're
> > cutting there... (I only have this new `hobby' of recording mixes off
> > the air, actually i'm just doing that as i type, and writing a CD at the
> > same time too.)
> >
>
> Yeah.. I haven't done anything really cool lately like loop and stuff. I mostly just
> do the basic take a piece out kind of thing. Occaisonally I pitch shift something
>for
> a better ending, or reuse a piece a couple of times. I particularly like the
>GoldWave
> interface (left click is beginning of selection, right click is end... hmm.. wonder
> where he got THAT idea from :)
>
Dunno but thats also how Gmurf does it btw.
> And actually, if you ever want to listen to stuff I can throw it up for download
Hell yes, why not... thanx!
> (I have a cable modem), with about 3 domain names pointing at it, and no I am not
> really squatting them, it's just that I thought they were cool and so I got 'em.
> (infinite-internet.{net,com} and luxurioushome.com). Well, luxurioushome.com we used
> to sell our old house, but the other two were going to be for a webhosting/design
> business that never flew (since there are so many cheap'n'crappy webdesigners out
> there is just no market for decent design).
>
Oh yes i _love_ those websites that take ages to display at 64kbit
(don't these `designers' know there are many people out there who
still only have a modem!) and then they can't even be used without
enabling the security hole called javascript. :( (or with w3m, when
you don't have enough RAM for this netscape monster to be usable, or
just want someting that doesn't regularly coredump...)
> > Have you looked at Gmurf? http://www.epita.fr:8000/~epx/projets/gmurf/
> > Looks like to do some cutting it may be enough, it only doesn't yet
> > work right on FreeBSD...
> >
>
> I have really gotten comfortable with Goldwave. Gmurf almost looks like it is trying
> to do too much (the Emacs of audio editing, I use VI myself).
>
*grin* i use (g)vim btw...
> >
> > > Fortunately my SBLive is supported with open source drivers now, so I am
> > > seriously considering putting some effort into getting stuff like GoldWave and
> > > Cakewalk to work under Wine so I can play around making music like I used to.
> > >
> > Also windows programs like GoldWave and Cakewalk aren't cheap either,
> > right?
> >
>
> Goldwave is like $25 to register, ...
Ok that i guess i wouldn't have a problem with _if_ the thing really
does work well. (still i'd like to get Gmurf running properly first,
maybe it'll then work well enough for me that i can avoid the overhead
of running something in an emulation.)
> > Yes FreeBSD uses CAM, and i would say this is the way SCSI should be done.
> >
>
> Yeah it is. Now all we need is Linux/CAM, Solaris/CAM, etc... Actually,
> Linux/CAM would be a good idea anyway-- especially since it has support for making
> your hostadapter act like a target,
Mmmh although i'm not sure thats alread implemented on FreeBSD yet...
> that'd be usefull with my VS-880EX, slap another
> SCSI card in the machine and make it look like a CD-R or something.
>
:)
(I wonder why such equipment nowadays not just simply has an rj45
plug and speaks proper tcp/ip, nics aren't _that_ expensive anymore.
using scsi for networking is pretty sick if you ask me...)
> Hmm.. maybe sometime in kernel 2.6.x or 3.0.x. The FreeBSD could would be a good
> implementation reference I would bet too.
>
> One thing that really needs to happen first though is a /dev filesystem, so that we
> can have stuff like /dev/sg/hh/cc/tt/dd instead of the current mess. Although I
>think
> in FreeBSD there is only one device per hostadapter (that kind of sucks since you
>have
> to give a program full controller permissions to access just one device).
>
Look again: there's a passthrough device for each target. (and yes,
anything else would be silly.)
> -Dave
>
> P.S. Dude.. I dislike the VMS commandline, remember: Men are from Macs, Women are
>from
> VMS (userfriendly.org).
Heh. i guess i should explain the Subject, it has nothing to do
with VMS...
Back in the `old days' vaxen were popular unix hosts too, so
popular that you'd often see code that made assumptions that are
only true on a vax (or at least only on _some_ systems, often
it also were things like assumptions about sizeof(int), or that
a pointer would fit in an int...) And so the usual comment on
people writing nonportable code quickly became: this guy is
suffering from the `all the world's a vax' syndrome!
Well and today it still hasn't really got better, the `vax' now
just seems to be linux... :/
(and yes now you all know i've been using unix longer than there
is linux (maybe thats another reason why i prefer the descendant
of the `real' unix that is BSD), and i also remember the good old
days on the internet before the web was invented, where you could
still post on usenet with your real From: and not have a mailbox
full of spam the next day...)
> Worse yet, my scool has an AXP running VMS and has been
> basically bought out by MS for all the new stuff.
Well, at work we recently replaced a M$ fileserver with a FreeBSD+
samba-and-a-RAID box, and when we got on the internet several years
ago we used FreeBSD for the webserver (colo'd at the isp) and for the
proxy/firewall/cache/mailserver from the beginning. (And i can
proudly say it was me who introduced it, don't ask me what would
have been used had i not been there... oh and the new fileserver
now wasn't even my idea.)
Regards,
--
Juergen Lock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(remove dot foo from address to reply)
