On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > I've looked into it some more, and it doesn't look like the
> > problem is that the socket is being polled repeatedly after
> > POLLHUP has been set; it's not locking up the wineserver or
> > anything.
> But you say that's not the case, the socket isn't even *connected*
> when things go haywire? Yes, that would certainly be strange...
>
> But I'm not quite sure that you handle strace correctly. At least
> use strace -f. When you do strace wine (without -f), you are pretty
> much only tracing the wineserver, not the client processes that do
> the real work (like calling connect() etc).
Ooops, the socket fd is different in the wineserver processes and
the client process, a fact which I had forgotten. So what I said
about the socket mysteriously being shutdown is probably not true.
--
Matthew Cline | Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you were a member of Congress. But I repeat
| myself. -- Mark Twain
