Several things jumped out at me about Mr. (Ms. ?  - can't really be
sure, given the way the author is identified) Weston:

        * seems to have a prejudice against tech types; used the
          possibly derogatory term "geeks" a total of seven times
          in the course of the opinion
        * follows what I view as the "keep 'em ignorant so we can sell 
          'em more stuff they don't need, all the while claiming
          it's in their best interests" philosophy used so
          successfully by Microsoft and typified recently by
          Bill Gates' TV ad.  I found the paragraph below a
          classic example of that approach.

        "The normal, none (sic) geek, type of user, doesn't care about
         what OS they work on. They are much more concerned with the 
         applications they run. Indeed, a fair percentage of people 
         don't even comprehend what an OS is. Microsoft word (sic)
         runs on a PC - the idea of another program, the OS, running at 
         the same time, invisibly, is just to (sic) deep, and they are 
         not in the business of wanting to learn yet another bit of
         technology."

         It's been my experience as a teacher that, contrary to
         condescending statements like these, users do care 
         about/want to comprehend.  They don't want to be software
         engineers, but they do like to have an idea of how the
         machine thinks/operates.

        * uses a unique brand of logic in drawing conclusions.  How
          he/she ever came to the point of saying that more use of
          Wine would result in less use of Linux, I'm not even going
          to try to understand.  :0)  Even less comprehensible is
          the suggestion that Wine is "inside out", so to speak, and
          that what's really needed/would be really effective is a
          "Linux emulator" for Windows.  Now there's a concept, and
          one which demonstrates that Weston must not know a great deal 
          about the natures of the 2 OSes in question.  I can't, for
          instance, even begin to imagine how such a piece of
          software would handle things like the differences in the
          structures of the file systems of the 2 OSes, or the
          differences in how they handle GUIs (i.e., X on one side
          of the fence but not the other ...)

Anyway, I competely agree with what seems to be the growing consensus
at Wine HQ that Weston is full of beans.

Michele Petrovsky

Reply via email to