On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Ove Kaaven wrote: > > Everyone using gcc 2.95 or higher has this problem, the asm syntax got > > somewhat stricter recently. > > Hardly. The 2.95 strictness problem was fixed last year or something (the > _clobber variable); it compiles just fine with my gcc 1:2.95.2-9 Debian > package. Oops, right, that was a "=D" (and not a "=d") in the input registers. Ryan, are you using pgcc 2.95.* by any chance? It has some known bugs that could cause this. LLaP bero
- Bad ASM in msdos/dpmi.c Ryan Cumming
- Re: Bad ASM in msdos/dpmi.c Ove Kaaven
- Re: Bad ASM in msdos/dpmi.c Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Bad ASM in msdos/dpmi.c Ove Kaaven
- Re: Bad ASM in msdos/dpmi.c Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Bad ASM in msdos/dpmi.c Marcus Meissner