Dimitrie O. Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>I think we should be a lot more agnostic about the string encoding. What I
>mean is that we should have only one function that works with all encodings,
>which takes as the first argument the encoding used by the other strings
>passed in as arguments:
...
Yes, Wine should have only one functional implementation indeed.
I think, it should be implemented like in NT: all actual work does
Unicode version, ANSI version simply converts ANSI to Unicode and
then calls Unicode work horse. But this transition will consume
a lot of time and efforts, because currently Wine does all work
in reverse order.
Dmitry.
