> For example. SHLWAPI has 150 (75 * 2) Path* function
> that does simple string manipulation. 75 of these could
> probably be generate using my generic mechanism.
>In fact, I think almost all SHLWAPI function would
>work with the generic mechanism.
Almost no function would work after this.
Most of the shlwapi functions are shorter than a A->W or
W->A conversion and many are having IN/OUT arguments
(modifying the input buffer or returning a pointer to a place
in this buffer) so it wont work and we really need 2
implementations.
Only the TCHAR way (two times compiling) would work
with most of the shlwapi functions and would IMHO
really make sense here (nowhere else possibly).
juergen
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... from sunny Berlin
