michael cardenas wrote:
>
> I just picked up the latest cvs tree from corel and made the necessary
> changes to my project for the dll separation. To get my project to link I
> had to explicitly link a number of dll's including:
>
> libcomdlg32.so
> libcomctl32.so
> libole32.so
> libshell32.so
>
> My question: is why are we doing this? Does this mean that to ship a
> winelib app we're going to have to ship a bunch of little .so files? Wine
> worked just fine as one big .so and all this means is that we're going to
> have to spend more time on linker errors.
this is the default (which allows a finer grain control on which dll to
load, and not to spoil memory with lots of unused DLLs)
if you prefer the old behaviour, use configure --disable-dll
(in fact, make distclean; configure --disable-dll; make depend; make)
A+
--
---------------
Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/)
"The future will be better tomorrow", Vice President Dan Quayle
