"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Leaving them as functions promotes laziness of the programmers which
> find this as a more easy way. It was so for xmalloc/xstrdup etc. until
> they were removed. I think converting already broken functions to
> the macros would be more convenient way to convince developers to
> not use them at all.
I fail to see why it would make the slightest difference whether they
are functions or macros. Lazy programmers won't look up the definition
anyway...
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
