michael cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's another small patch, written by Phil Landman (one of our
> programmers) for PeekMessage that solves the problem of winelib apps
> taking 99% of the cpu when they're idle. It's just a counter that waits
> a little bit if we haven't recieved any messages in a while. You'll
> see... Anyway, it works well, we only use 5% when we're in the background.
Well, if your app is sitting in a PeekMessage loop I'd expect it to
take 99% of the CPU... I don't think this is anything wrong with
PeekMessage itself.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
