On 28 May 2000, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > MAP_SHARED Share this mapping with all other processes > > that map this object > > > > Now, is it just me, or if you mmap() shared sections with MAP_SHARED, then > > everything works beautifully? > > No, because the mapping will also be shared with the disk file, so > that modifications to the shared section will modify the executable on > disk; not exactly what we want... > Good point :) Okay, what about loading shared sections in to the wine server process, and having processes that use those shared sections anonymously mmap() them in to their own address space?
- Re: Address space separation - turnpike-connec... robert w hall
- Re: Address space separation gerard patel
- Re: Address space separation Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Address space separation gerard patel
- Re: Address space separation Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: Address space separation bodnar42
- Re: Address space separation Eric Pouech
- Re: Address space separation bodnar42
- Re: Address space separation bodnar42
- Re: Address space separation Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Address space separation bodnar42
- Re: Address space separation Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Address space separation gerard patel
- Re: Address space separation Rein Klazes
- Re: Address space separation Uwe Bonnes
- Re: Address space separation Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Address space separation lawson_whitney
- Address space separation Uwe Bonnes
- Re: Address space separation Guy L. Albertelli