Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I found, in the FreeBSD ports collection (where I became maintainer of > the Wine port which I'm plan to ``minimize''), the following patch which > is superflous as far as can see. I think so yes. Setting the address to 1 is necessary on PTRACE_CONT (which we are doing already), not on PTRACE_ATTACH. I think you can safely get rid of this patch. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Wine server/ptrace.c, please help reviewing! Gerald Pfeifer
- Alexandre Julliard