Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a last point would be to have Alexandre's agreement to use DocBook as
> primary format for documentation. I remembered one of his remarks
> where he wished to have at least all docs in text format so anyone
> could read them (it doesn't mean of course docs must be written in text
> format)
I think the important factor is that the doc is as accessible as
possible; if it requires the user to install a lot of tools just to be
able to read the doc there is a problem. And this is what worries me a
bit about DocBook; I find the raw SGML text painful to read, and I'm
not sure how easy it is to get the right tools to format it to
something readable. I think texinfo is better in this respect; but
this is only a personal opinion, ultimately the choice is up to the
people who actually write the doc.
What do other people think? Any strong opinions for/against DocBook?
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
