Bertho Stultiens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good point, would save a lot of run-time space.
It wouldn't save anything, unused resources won't get swapped in
anyway.
> I'd suggest to use the
> language-codes directly in the names (with or without sublanguages) and
> symlink the default language (0,0) to English (or whatever). However,
> there must be some kind of clever module management to cope with several
> languages.
We already have language management for resources, I don't see any
reason for adding a new mechanism for dlls. I think we should simply
store the message table in the kernel32.dll resources.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
