Andreas Mohr writes:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 03:44:16PM +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > is there any reason to further work on wine crtdll? Running e.g. a
> > MingW programm needs a lot more functions in crtdll. Running with a
> > native crtdkk however makes the program work.
> >
> > If crtdll is distributed with applications, I think we can drop it.
> >
> > Opinions?
> Yes.
> We cannot drop it.
> I didn't know that native CRTDLL works.
> But where it doesn't work (AFAIK - correct me if I'm wrong) is the
> file handle problem (the internal struct order is different).
> This needs to be solved, and of course this has to happen in the
> builtin CRTDLL.
>
Hallo,
no quick shots :-)
CRTDLL isn't a low level DLL like NTDLL. Many thinks that don't work
with wine crtdll work with native crtdll. File handling is done
through Api Calls into Kernel/User and so even the file handle problem
shouldn't exist.
A scan through native CRTDLL on my system lists 622 exported APIs. And
especially Cygwin/MingW programs use a lot of them...
Bye
Uwe Bonnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
