Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Didn't you read wine-devel first? Veksler Michael already reported it, and
> I gave a reply... according to AT&T syntax conventions, an absolute (as
> opposed to relative) call *must* have an asterisk. That the asterisk is
> not recognized is a bug in earlier versions of gas. More recent versions
> of gas (which I have) wants the asterisk and complains if it's not there,
> so leaving the star out doesn't seem like a long-term solution. Perhaps
> someone could do a configure check or something?
No, just output the raw instruction bytes with .byte (and a comment
explaining what instruction it was supposed to be ;-). We are already
doing this at a few places for "exotic" instructions.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
