> > The reason is that some windows apps pass NULL pointers and expect > > ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER to be returned, and not a Dr. Watson pop-up ;) > > If you've already got a wrapper for strlen(), why use additional exception > handling for this case? Couldn't you save a lot of overhead by using an > "if" in the wrapper to check for NULL pointers? The problems that apps do not only NULL pointers to fail that way, but invalid, non NULL, pointers too. Ciao, Marcus
- lstrlenA exception handling Jim Aston
- Re: lstrlenA exception handling Marcus Meissner
- Re: lstrlenA exception handling Deven T. Corzine
- Re: lstrlenA exception handling Marcus Meissner
- Re: lstrlenA exception handling Deven T. Corzine
- Re: lstrlenA exception handling Marcus Meissner
- Re: lstrlenA exception handli... Deven T. Corzine
- Re: lstrlenA exception handling Jim Aston
- Re: lstrlenA exception handling Alexandre Julliard
