Re: Problems with inlined strlenW and gcc 2.95.2 with -O2

[Ulrich Weigand]

Dmitry wrote:

> Some workarounds:
> 1. Without -O2 - all right.
> 2. Disabling assembly in strlenW - all right.
> 
> Ideas?

It would appear that a __volatile__ is missing in strlenW;
therefore, the CSE pass assumes strlenW(lpBuffer) has always
the same value (as long as the value of lpBuffer doesn't change), 
even though in fact the value of strlenW(lpBuffer) depends on the 
*contents* of lpBuffer.

Bye,
Ulrich


-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]