Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why's that? It can't be harder to do than agreeing on a clean design and > writing a couple of lines of code... the current registry model would only > require minor tweaks to enable registry sharing (except that Alexandre > broke wine.userreg saving recently) wine.userreg is going away. It will be split into user.reg for HKEY_CURRENT_USER and userdef.reg for HKEY_USERS\.Default (but yes it is a bit broken at the moment because we still try to use the old wine.userreg if present). -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Jeremy White
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Andreas Mohr
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Ove Kaaven
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Jeremy White
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do David Elliott
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Marcus Meissner
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Martin Pilka
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Jeremy White
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do David . Goodenough
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Jeremy White
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do David Elliott
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do Martin Pilka
- Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do David Elliott
