"Dimitrie O. Paun" wrote:
> From: "David Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > wine-doc: All kinds of wine documentation. Don't forget to use the
> > appropriate macro for the docdir as some RPM systems use /usr/doc while the
> > newest redhat has gone to /usr/share/doc to be more inline with the new
> > filesystem standard. However, it may be a good idea to have some of the
> > documentation as part of the main wine package, especially things related to
> > configuring wine on the system.
>
> We really do not need this package. Really guys, we do not have that much docs
> anyway, and the potentially big ones belong in the -devel package anyway.
>
> Moreover, for people that are really tight on disk space, rpm has flags to skip
> the installation of the bundled documentation.
>
> All we need is:
> wine, wine-devel, wine-utils (maybe)
>
> It's always a hassle to d/l and install more packages than necessary. KISS.
>
> --
> Dimi.
DOH! I forgot about rpm having the option to not install documentation (I have
40GB, so haven't needed it).. good idea. Yes, don't have a seperate docs package
but instead include the various docs either in wine or wine-devel (or wine-utils)
depending on what they pertain to. I totally agree with this.
-Dave
