Ken Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>2. I wanted to verify the ordinal numbers, so I booted up a WinNT 4.0
>machine to use DUMPBIN. What I found was that all of the ordinal
>numbers seem to be wrong - the MapVirtualKey* funtions all have ordinals
>> 400 according to DUMPBIN, but the values in the comments of
>windows/input.c put them in the range 383-385. Are the comments wrong?
>Does it even matter? Also, they seem to be out of order -
>MapVirtualKeyExW should go between MapVirtualKeyExA and MapVirtualKeyW
>according to DUMPBIN, but there's no empty ordinal in between based on
>the comments.
As there was explained several times, under Windows all functions, exported
by name can be assigned an arbitrary ordinal name: those functions are not
supposed to be imported by ordinal. As confirmation for this statement serves
MS practice to have different ordinals for those functions for NT and 95/98.
