"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any interest in enabling static linking again. Can it be
> done? From a linking point of view, we have to make sure we do not have
> multiple definitions of a debug channel. For this I have a patch that
> makes them local to their dll by including the name of the dll in their
> name. What about the rest? If there is interest, I'll clean up the patch
> and post it, but otherwise...
The main problem is that the import mechanism is not going to work at
all with static linking. So no, I don't think it's worth the effort.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
