On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Patrik Stridvall wrote: > So if optimization can't analyze what inline assembler does it > shouldn't do any optimizations that depends on what the assembler > code does. Can you please provide a minimal example? (I missed the original mail, but will try to have a look and have it fixed, if it really is a bug.) > That said IIRC the documentation for -O6 says it uses heuristics > which sort of means that generated code might not be correct > even if gcc is bug free. In other words don't use -O6. Your reading of the documentation is not correct. Plus, I'd really be interested to see where you found -O6 being described. GCC does not have such an option (but automatically reduces it to -O3). Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
- Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -O6 Vedran Rodic
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with g... Ove Kaaven
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with g... Gerald Pfeifer
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Ove Kaaven
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with g... Gerald Pfeifer
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with gcc -... Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Problems when compiling Wine 20001202 with g... Gerald Pfeifer