> Why do you wish to know awk (except to read awk applications)?
> Perl is much better.
Just for a more lightweight solution (one liners). I know, though, I should
just learn more Perl...
> Also strange function protypes that can't be identified as such
> are simple skipped and it is hard for me to know if that happends.
> Please report to me if you find any.
OK, Ive found a couple so far but I'll lump them together when I have it
working. Right know I have it generating prototypes and blank functions with
the correct parameters. Still some work to go though.
> Anyway I'm not sure it really should handle such things.
> After all you can alway use sort and uniq or
> a simple perl script. It isn't very useful
> at its current form so some formating is needed anyway.
I agree, I dont think it should. I have to do post processing on the results
anyway (insert variable names for tracing etc), so its not a problem.
> Your welcome.
:-)
Cheers,
Jon
--
"May their negative actions ripen upon me. And may all my virtues ripen upon
them."
"If it could be talked about, everybody would have told their brother."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
