Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems Alexandre applied my first signal_i386 patch. So here's something
> slightly less likely to attract cheers... blocking of all signals until
> the %fs is set in the signal handler. If an async signal occurs inside a
> previous signal, before the previous has set its fs, then the new signal
> won't be able to figure out which %fs to use... crash. So what could I do?
I'd find it cleaner to only block the signals that can actually cause
trouble (SIGALRM, SIGINT, SIGIO), and to not unblock them at all
during signal handling.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
