Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe I understand you incorrectly, but a plain text or html version
> of the documentation should be provided with the normal tarball,
> just like we provide not only configure.in but also configure because
> there would be so many more questions/help requests from people who
> have problems with autoconf. How can we point people to the documen-
> tation if it is hard to read? Pointing them to an external source
> isn't really helpful: a readable documentation should go with the
> package.
It does; only it's in separate tar files because I don't want to force
everybody to download the doc in 4 different formats if they don't
need it. If someone can download the source package, they can also
probably figure out how to download the doc package that sits in the
same directory (we probably should mention this in the README though,
patches welcome).
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
