Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is a fix for the problem below. Since all COM port fds are > non-blocking, if we get an error (EAGAIN) return from the initial > read, we should just ignore it and let the wineserver poll on it.
Shouldn't you check for EAGAIN then? It doesn't seem safe to ignore all errors. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]