Mike McCormack  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This is a fix for the problem below. Since all COM port fds are
> non-blocking, if we get an error (EAGAIN) return from the initial
> read, we should just ignore it and let the wineserver poll on it.

Shouldn't you check for EAGAIN then?  It doesn't seem safe to ignore
all errors.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to