On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Joerg Mayer wrote: > OK, when the last discussion was going on, I started out with the opinion > that the change would be good and changed it to not so good, because if > proprietary stuff that *is* part of the windows kernel (or drivers) needs > to be implemented, this can't be done with an LGPLed wine. My final idea > (which I never mailed) was, that maybe a X11-licensed kernel (including > wineserver and driver emulation) and LGPLed dlls for the rest would be > the best solution.
Yeah, that could work. But I still don't understand your objections about the proprietary drivers: LGPL would work just fine with that. What's your concern? -- Dimi.
