On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:14:13AM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote: > > > > On 18 Feb 2002, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > > > > We now have to decide the implementation details, like the exact > > > license used, whether to require copyright assignments, etc. My > > > suggestion is that we create a separate mailing list to discuss that, > > > to avoid drowning wine-devel under yet another license flame war. > > > > OK, I've created a wine-license list. You can subscribe at > > http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-license > > or by sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Should discussions about where the X11 fork goes also be discussed there? > Umm, why wine-license ? > > I thought that Jeremy's suggestion of wine-legal was a better idea... Hmm. I had probably Uwe's requests for wine-license in mind more than anything else, so must have missed that. But should we change the list name now?
