At 04:10 PM 2/19/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Won't you wait a bit and see what kind of copyleft we can cobble up?
>I don't think anyone wants it to be very oppressive at all.

"Copyleft," by its very definition, is intended to destroy the
benefits of copyright to authors. There is no "kind" of copyleft
that is ethical, because it is not ethical to confiscate authors'
work nor to discriminate against them in licensing.

--Brett



Reply via email to