Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But some people DON'T separate it. > (for various reasons, which might only be evident in the future)
If people want to break the directory structure that's their choice, but I don't see a valid reason for doing it. > Fact is that a LOT of people/distributors still add it to ld.so.conf. Nobody adds it to ld.so.conf since the directory doesn't exist at the moment. People add /usr/local/lib or whatever the lib directory is, and that will still be correct with the new scheme. > But are you sure that you can just omit the lib prefix on *all* supported > environments ? If there are environments that don't support it they can use some other scheme. I don't think any Unix platform would have the problem. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
