On March 19, 2002 12:48 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: > > > The point is not to freeze the protocol completely, it will clearly > > continue to evolve even after 1.0. The idea is that once the protocol > > is declared frozen all future changes are done in a way that preserves > > backwards compatibility. And the mechanisms to do that are mostly in > > place now, which is what I mean by saying it is finished. > > OK, so in other words the wineserver *is* more or less "independent from > such changes".
How can that be? What we want is that DLLs compiled with 1.x, work (at the binary level) with any 1.y server, where x <= y, right? -- Dimi.
