On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Andriy Palamarchuk wrote: > --- Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/ > > Looks good. I don't know if we need this information > online.
True. We could get away with just an email when something broke, but the web interface is supposed to provide a more elegant way of discovering what went wrong. There's quite a lot of information in the raw data (it can easily be over 300k). Obviously I couldn't send that to wine-devel: I would have to trim it down. The web interface should allow people to select the important information and ignore the rest. There's also links to cvsweb and patch information, so figuring out which change caused the regression should be easy (fixing it might not be, though ;) > However, having the automated tests and > mailing wine-devel in case something breaks is, > probably a good idea. Yep, emailing wine-devel sounds like a good idea. What information would be useful? I think the minimum is a list of applied patches, the tests that broke and a link to the buildinfo web page. Paul.
