[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 1. submit smaller patches periodically between snapshots, but possibly > patches made against out-of-date code. > > 2. submit larger patches every time a new snapshot comes out, including all > the changes I've made since the last snapshot. > > Option 1 has the advantage that I can submit smaller patches, but 2 has the > advantage that the patches are more likely to be up-to-date. > > My inclination is towards option 2, but I thought I would ask on the list and > see if there was a preference here...
Smaller patches are always better; and if they are small enough it doesn't really matter if they are not up to date, I can merge them easily. So option 1 is the best choice. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
