>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Why would address space separation break the native user dll?
Michael> Shouldn't wine's address space handling be the same as windows?
Michael> Maybe there's something I'm not understanding...
Well, there's a memory model for win32 and some hacks MS uses for Win9X...
Michael> On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:48:12PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>> > > and I was wondering if it's still true. > yes, and it will
>> likely remain so > native user32 requires lots of bits from native >
>> kernel (which are no longer available because of > adress space
...
Trying to run with native User32, the first obstacle I meet is K208. After
the call to K208, DS==0 and things obvious crash. Making K208 a void
function returning 0 continues until the function GETFASTQUEUE, which
anounces itself "expect failure!" as the thread-local queue seems not
initialized at that moment...
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
