Sylvain Petreolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we want to support the langage, we should put in > a new nls language description in dlls/kernel/winnls, > because no one exists for now. > do you agree with this or should we stop the support > for this language ?
I suggest we just ignore it until someone who cares takes the trouble to make it work again. It's not like there is a huge public demand for that language <g> -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
