Andriy Palamarchuk wrote: >Thanks everybody for the very active feedback. > [snip]
>You do not need to subscribe to wine-bugs if you are >not planning to work in the first line of the bugs >hanlding (handling of bugs with status UNCONFIRMED). > >Please, let me know if I missed anybody. >Other comments are welcome too. > > [snip] Right now there are only three of us [four if you count Marcus] doing triage on bugs. I have some comments and questions about various bugs and how to deal with them in a general nature. I don't want to clutter up wine devel with useless stuff but I think they should be talked about. Would it be better to have discussions of a general nature on wine bugs or on wine devel. For example: There are several bugs that are specific examples of the general bug "SetActiveWindow does not support foreign processes" http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475. Would it be better to mark them as duplicate or as depending on. Tony Lambregts
